Principal Ron Smolkin’s relations with staff at Manhattan’s
Independence HS were always frosty, teachers say. But they turned
arctic last spring after the school’s faculty leadership team made a
series of ambitious recommendations on safety, teaching, guidance,
consensus and collegiality.
The team never got a reply or even an acknowledgment from the
principal. As Chapter Leader Michael McPherrin put it, “Smolkin refuses
to discuss plans and leadership style. He even takes suggestions as a
personal affront. He goes after those he sees as disloyal; questioning
his policies is to enter a world of pain.”
He also apparently plays payback — as a sequence of events reported by
the media in late March suggests.
McPherrin, a leading member of the faculty leadership team, got a big
surprise when his co-op board received an anonymous letter charging him
with sex and drug crimes. With copies sent to Immigration and Customs
Enforcement and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as well as the
FBI and the IRS, the letter declared that McPherrin and his
“undocumented” partner were engaged in “spreading disease” and “unsafe
sex with underaged boys.”
An independent handwriting analyst hired by McPherrin found it “highly
likely” that the author of the hand-addressed envelope was Smolkin.
In late summer, McPherrin got a second surprise, when his classroom at
the West Midtown campus was trashed. It was the only classroom in the
school so destroyed, McPherrin said. Since December, McPherrin has
received five letters in his file. Prior to last spring, he had
received none.
Now Smolkin is under investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s
Office for aggravated criminal harassment, and the state’s Human Rights
Commission is also conducting a probe. McPherrin has filed a harassment
complaint against Smolkin under Article 23 of the contract.
As the New York Teacher went to press, McPherrin reported that Smolkin
had filed 3020a dismissal charges against him for unprofessional
conduct.
Smolkin has been principal at the two-campus transfer alternative high
school (a smaller campus is housed in the West Village) since the
spring of 2004. The school educates 425 overage, under-credited
students who have aged out of their class cohort or dropped out.
McPherrin says the principal’s relationship with the staff is
“poisonous.”
“He’s the biggest obstacle to the school’s success,” McPherrin says.
“He operates in terms of who’s in and who’s out.”
The six other teachers at Independence HS interviewed for this article,
all on condition of anonymity because they feared retaliation,
confirmed that Smolkin is widely viewed as remote, divisive and
vindictive.
McPherrin and other staffers said the school is not safe for students
and staff alike. There is gang activity and drugs are used openly, said
the chapter leader, “usually near the LYFE center,” which houses
infants and toddlers of students.
McPherrin and others accuse Smolkin of underreporting safety incidents
and not enforcing discipline. “He won’t take a stand because he’s
afraid that if he does, attendance will drop,” one teacher said.
Since December, McPherrin has filed five union safety complaints,
charging Smolkin with having no meaningful student removal process,
making no effort to deter student texting in class, not supervising the
school’s vendor-run after-school program, and refusing to hold safety
committee meetings for his school.
Staffers say it’s no coincidence that the academic performance of the
students is suffering. Independence HS received another C on its most
recent School Progress Report, but there is a widespread belief among
faculty that Smolkin fiddled with the parent survey results to avoid an
F. The school received an F in student performance and a C in student
progress, but somehow pulled off a near-perfect score on the Learning
Environment Survey to earn an A in school environment. Staff noticed
that the returns showed the number of parent responses exceeded the
number of parents who picked up surveys.
Smolkin keeps parents at arm’s length, too. He has done as little as he
can to create a school leadership team. Only after staff complained to
the superintendent did he move the team meetings to a time more
convenient to parents.
Marc Korashan, the UFT’s alternative high schools district
representative, blasts the DOE for not riding herd on Smolkin. In an
email letter to Manhattan HS Superintendent Elaine Gorman, Korashan
said that the principal “continues to make veiled threats about
reorganizing the school and putting people out of jobs. His attitude
toward staff remains dismissive or threatening. It seems clear that
[the principal] does not want an active parent body or an effective SLT
looking at what is happening in the school.”
Korashan’s email letter concludes: “The question remains: When does
administration step in to support the school and not the principal?”
Gorman and a representative from network leader Sumita Kaufhold’s
office met in February with 12 staff members at their request, but so
far neither official has intervened.
“This kind of support for a principal who is leading a school to fail
is something we’ve seen time and again with this DOE,” said Korashan.
“If Independence HS is put on the Persistently Lowest Achieving list,
it will certainly not be the fault of the teachers who have tried to
create a collaborative, student-centered culture at the school only to
be stymied by this principal.”